Tag Archive: barack

Adoption and/or Name Change?

HRS §§338-17.7, 338-20.5 states a person who has “previously recorded information in relation to the person’s surname and/or the father’s personal particulars has been altered pursuant to law” can obtain an amended birth certificate. Therefore, it is possible Obama was not adopted but received a name change which would also explain the court order that was asked for by Perkins Coie. It is also possible Obama was both adopted and had a name change.




#1:What does it matter if Obama was adopted?

If Obama was adopted, this means Barack Obama has kept this fact hidden from the public. Why would he want to hide this fact? It is possible Obama has an amended birth certificate and may have committed fraud to obtain student aid.

#2:Why is Obama’s birth parents listed on his birth certificate?

This one’s easy. Perkins Coie specifically requested the ORIGINAL long form. The original long form does indeed have the “birth parents” listed. If Obama was adopted, he should have an amended birth certificate with updated information reflecting the adoption.

#3:Obama is a natural born citizen. Isn’t any point you’re trying to make already moot?

First of all, Obama may not be a natural born citizen. Second, it is not moot because Obama may have a history of hiding behind aliases and committing fraud. Also, if Obama had Indonesian citizenship, can a duel citizen be considered a natural born citizen? For that matter, do we know for a fact if Obama is actually an American?

#4: You’re lying; Hawaii does not release long form birth certificates upon request. Factcheck has confirmed this. Aren’t your points moot?

At one point in time, you WERE able to obtain your long form if you had a direct interest. This was confirmed by Governor Lingle of Hawaii. Also, long forms have made there way onto the net. All people had to do was pay a fee of around $10 to receive their long form.
What Hawaii regulations actually state is that it’s up to Hawaii to decide if someone requesting a long form should have access to it. There was NO NEED for a court order unless Hawaii specifically denied a request for whatever reason.

#5: Who cares?

I care.


Exhibit A:

Barack Obama II’s Indonesian School records-

Barry Soetoro

Exhibit B:

Stanley Ann Dunham’s passport records (lists Obama as Soebarkah, literal translation, “who is this but the son of Lolo Soetoro?”)


Exhibit C:

Divorce records (Barry Soetoro is stated as being Lolo Soetoro’s son)-

Divorce Records

Exhibit D (Brand New Exhibit):

From the Post and E-mail website today:

“Before we talked to Horiuchi, Jesse Koike, the point person for anyone who questions these things, came over and I questioned why I couldn’t get the long form, said, “That is the long form,” and I said, “Well, if that’s the long form, what do you call this?” and I showed him Obama’s, the forgery.  And I said, “If you’re president of the United States, you can have a copy of the long form, but the rest of us have to pound sand.”

So then he said, “There was a court order so that would be released.”


This new piece of evidence is important because it proves Obama had a court order! The only reason he would need a court order as President of the United States is if his original birth certificate was sealed. Only a court order can undo the seal.  Birth certificates are sealed when a child is adopted. The child is given an amended birth certificate after the adoption is confirmed.


From WND:
“Talk-radio host and former Nixon White House operative G. Gordon Liddy told WND that one of his trusted informants in Hawaii reported to him that while the document was forged recently, there may have been tampering with official Obama birth records as far back as 1978.”

Why would Barry Soetoro’s records be tampered with in 1978?

This is a question many Americans are now asking. It is a topic I would like to make one of the main focuses of my blog. So too often we have people completely dismissing “birther” claims without doing any imperative research for themselves. If one were to look at this issue with an open mind, perhaps he/she would be able to see the legitimate arguments this group of people brings to the table.

I hope to provide an unbiased analysis of both “birther” and anti-birther research that I  have discovered over the years. I have yet to come across a site that presents both “birther” and anti-birther evidence objectively. Each group’s preconceived bias usually hampers debate and promotes partisanship. I hope to partially remedy this situation by providing a place where true skeptics and open minded peoples can come and inform themselves. If there is one wish I have for all my visitors, it is that they will deny ignorance.